Midterm elections: 2018 California propositions

//start//

definition:

bond:
“in a state of a serf, unfree,”
a bond is an instrument of indebtedness of the bond issuer to the holders.
It is a debt security, under which the issuer owes the holders a debt and, depending on the terms of the bond, is obliged to pay them interest (the coupon)
and/or
to repay the principal at a later date, termed the maturity date.


sources:


Proposition: a presentation

California ballot proposition
a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote.


prop1
Housing Programs and Veterans’ Loans Bond (2018):
(Issues) write a check
for $4 billion
in tax payer funds
for housing programs
and
veterans’ home loans.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
taxes will increase
to fund veterans
and affordable housing.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
tax payers won’t be in debt.

myVote[no]
(my reason)
let entrepreneurs find ways to build.

//end//


prop2
Use Millionaire’s Tax Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Housing Bonds Measure (2018):
Authorizes state
to use revenue from
millionaire’s tax
for $2 billion in bonds
for mental health services,
homelessness prevention housing.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
taxes will increase
to fund

if you vote
no,
then(why)
tax payers won’t be in debt.

myVote[no]
(my reason)
let entrepreneurs find ways to build.


//end//




prop3
Water Infrastructure and Watershed Conservation Bond Initiative (2018):
Issues $8.877 billion
in bonds
for water-related infrastructure
and
environmental projects.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
taxes for water infrastructure.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
tax payers won’t be in debt.

myVote[no]
(my reason)
let entrepreneurs find ways to build.



//end//




prop4

Children’s Hospital Bonds Initiative (2018):
Issues $1.5 billion
in bonds
for children’s hospitals.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
taxes for construction, renovation, and equipping of children’s hospitals.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
tax payers won’t be in debt.

myVote[no]
(my reason)
let entrepreneurs find ways to build.
//end//





prop5

Property Tax Transfer Initiative (2018):
amends prop 13(1978)
allows home-buyers
who are age 55 or older
or severely disabled
to transfer the tax-assessed value
from their prior home
to their new home,
no matter
(a) the new home’s market value;
(b) the new home’s location in the state;
or
(c) the number of moves.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
supports amending Proposition 13 (1978) to allow homebuyers who are
age 55 or
older or
severely disabled
to transfer their tax assessments,
with a possible adjustment,
from their prior home
to their new home,
no matter
(a) the new home’s market value;
(b) the new home’s location in the state;
or
(c) the buyer’s number of moves.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
opposes amending Proposition 13 (1978)
to change how tax assessments are transferred between properties
for home-buyers who are age
55 or
older or
severely disabled.

myVote[yes]
it’s their property.


//end//




prop6

Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative (2018):
Repeals 2017’s fuel tax
and vehicle fee increases and
requires public vote on
future increases.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
repeals fuel tax increases
and vehicle fees
that were enacted in 2017,
including
the Road Repair and
Accountability Act of 2017 (RRAA)
and
require voter approval
(via ballot propositions)
for the California State Legislature
to impose, increase, or extend
fuel taxes
or
vehicle fees in
the future.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
keeps the fuel tax increases
and vehicle fees
that were enacted in 2017,
including
the Road Repair and Accountability Act
of 2017 (RRAA),
in place and
allowing the state legislature
to continue to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes
or
vehicle fees
through a two-thirds vote
of each chamber and without voter approval.

myVote[yes]
I don’t want to pay the tax.

//end//




prop7

Permanent Daylight Saving Time Measure (2018):
Authorizes legislature
to provide for
permanent daylight saving time
if federal government allows.

no direct fiscal effect
because changes to daylight saving time would depend on future actions by the Legislature and potentially
the federal government.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
supports allowing the California State Legislature
to establish
permanent,
year-round daylight saving time (DST)
in California by
a two-thirds vote
if federal law is changed
to allow for permanent DST.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
opposes allowing the California State Legislature to establish
permanent,
year-round daylight saving time (DST)
in California
by a two-thirds vote
if federal law is changed
to allow for permanent DST.

myVote[yes]
let the time be fixed.
//end//




prop8

Limits on Dialysis Clinics’ Revenue and Required Refunds Initiative (2018):
Requires dialysis clinics
to issue refunds
for revenue above
a certain amount.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
supports requiring dialysis clinics
to issue refunds
to patients
or
patients’ payers
for revenue above
115 percent of the costs of
direct patient care
and healthcare improvements.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
opposes requiring
dialysis clinics
to issue refunds
to patients
or
patients’ payers for
revenue above 115 percent of
the costs of
direct patient care
and healthcare improvements.

myVote[no]
why:
I don’t believe in prohibitions,
why:
according to the committee,
the requirement to refund profits
above the limit
would result in clinic closures
and reduced patient access.
//end//




prop10

Local Rent Control Initiative (2018):
establishes rent control in California.

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
allows local governments
to adopt rent control
on any type of rental housing.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
prohibit local governments
from enacting rent control

myVote[no]
rent control has failed in new york,
i don’t want to end up like new york.

New housing construction stopped. Existing housing was allowed to deteriorate.


//end//




prop11

Ambulance Employees Paid On-Call Breaks, Training, and Mental Health Services Initiative (2018):

Ambulance Employees
Paid On-Call Breaks,
Training,
and
Mental Health Services Initiative (2018)
if you vote
yes,
then(why)
you will be:
forcing ambulance providers to
force workers to remain on-call
during breaks
paid at their regular rate;

forcing employers to pay for
additional training for EMTs and paramedics; and
forcing employers to provide EMTs and paramedics with some paid mental health services.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
you will not be:
forcing ambulance providers to
force workers to remain on-call
during breaks
paid at their regular rate;

forcing employers to pay for
additional training for EMTs and paramedics; and
forcing employers to provide EMTs and paramedics with some paid mental health services.

myVote[no]
this will increase the cost of doing business,
therefore decreases the number of first responder’s.

//end//





prop12

Farm Animal Confinement Initiative (2018)

if you vote
yes,
then(why)
you will be:
establish minimum space requirements based on square feet for
calves raised for veal,
breeding pigs, and
egg-laying hens

and

ban the sale of
(a) veal from calves,
(b) pork from breeding pigs, and
(c) eggs from hens when the animals are confined to areas below minimum square-feet requirements.

if you vote
no,
then(why)
keeping in place minimum space requirements based on animal movement
—not square feet—
for calves raised for veal,
breeding pigs, and
egg-laying hens

and

continuing to ban the sale of
shelled eggs from hens
—but not liquid eggs from hens,
veal from calves, or
pork from breeding pigs—
that are confined to areas not meeting space requirements based on animal movement standards.

myVote[no]
this will increase food costs,
why would you change the standards from animal movement standards to square feet?
sounds like punishment to me.


//end//

Happy Birthday: US Navy

#update
the Navy molded me.
Happy birthday dad.
you’ve shown me how to be a better person in life.
thanks for the life skills
@usnavy

//
From corpsmen to Seabees,
we couldn’t do our job without you.
Here’s to 243 years
of dominating the seas.
Happy Birthday.

from @USMC
//
#photo
#birthday
#fall
#love
#sandiego

Feminism: Lara Trump

Hive Mind

I think I think a lot,
I don’t.

This is how I see the world.

A Short History of Democrats, Republicans, and Racism

bendTheKnee

author: Russ Paielli


The following
are a few basic historical facts that every American should know.

pragerU

Fact: The Republican Party was founded primarily to oppose slavery, and Republicans eventually abolished slavery. The Democratic Party fought them and tried to maintain and expand slavery. The 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery, passed in 1865 with 100% Republican support but only 23% Democrat support in congress.

pbs Civil War

Why is this indisputable fact so rarely mentioned? PBS documentaries about slavery and the Civil War barely mention it, for example. One can certainly argue that the parties have changed in 150 years (more about that below), but that does not change the historical fact that it was the Democrats who supported slavery and the Republicans who opposed it. And that indisputable fact should not be airbrushed out for fear that it will tarnish the modern Democratic Party.

Had the positions of the parties been the opposite, and the Democrats had fought the Republicans to end slavery, the historical party roles would no doubt be repeated incessantly in these documentaries. Funny how that works.

Fact: During the Civil War era, the “Radical Republicans” were given that name because they wanted to not only end slavery but also to endow the freed slaves with full citizenship, equality, and rights.

Yes, that was indeed a radical idea at the time!

Fact: Lincoln’s Vice President, Andrew Johnson, was a strongly pro-Union (but also pro-slavery) Democrat who had been chosen by Lincoln as a compromise running mate to attract Democrats. After Lincoln was assassinated, Johnson thwarted Republican efforts in Congress to recognize the civil rights of the freed slaves, and Southern Democrats continued to thwart any such efforts for close to a century.

Fact: The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress.

Regardless of what has happened since then, shouldn’t we be grateful to the Republicans for these Amendments to the Constitution? And shouldn’t we remember which party stood for freedom and which party fiercely opposed it?

Fact: The Ku Klux Klan was originally and primarily an arm of the Southern Democratic Party. Its mission was to terrorize freed slaves and “ni**er-loving” (their words) Republicans who sympathized with them.

Why is this fact conveniently omitted in so many popular histories and depictions of the KKK, including PBS documentaries? Had the KKK been founded by Republicans, that fact would no doubt be repeated constantly on those shows.

Fact: In the 1950s, President Eisenhower, a Republican, integrated the US military and promoted civil rights for minorities. Eisenhower pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1957. One of Eisenhower’s primary political opponents on civil rights prior to 1957 was none other than Lyndon Johnson, then the Democratic Senate Majority Leader. LBJ had voted the straight segregationist line until he changed his position and supported the 1957 Act.

Fact: The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it.

Fact: Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never “switched” on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to a subversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible on government to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a cynical smear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious strategy as greedy racists.

Following the epic civil rights struggles of the 1960s, the South began a major demographic shift from Democratic to Republican dominance. Many believe that this shift was motivated by racism. While it is certainly true that many Southern racists abandoned the Democratic Party over its new support for racial equality and integration, the notion that they would flock to the Republican Party — which was a century ahead of the Democrats on those issues — makes no sense whatsoever.

Yet virtually every liberal, when pressed on the matter, will inevitably claim that the parties “switched,” and most racist Democrats became Republicans! In their minds, this historical ju jitsu maneuver apparently transfers all the past sins of the Democrats (slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, etc.) onto the Republicans and all the past virtues of the Republicans (e.g., ending slavery) onto the Democrats! That’s quite a feat!

It is true that Barry Goldwater’s opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 probably attracted some racist Democrats to the Republican Party. However, Goldwater was not a racist — at least not an overt racist like so many Southern Democrats of the time, such as George Wallace and Bull Connor. He publicly professed racial equality, and his opposition to the 1964 Act was based on principled grounds of states rights. In any case, his libertarian views were out of step with the mainstream, and he lost the 1964 Presidential election to LBJ in a landslide.

But Goldwater’s opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act provided liberals an opening to tar the Republican Party as racist, and they have tenaciously repeated that label so often over the years that it is now the conventional wisdom among liberals. But it is really nothing more than an unsubstantiated myth — a convenient political lie. If the Republican Party was any more racist than the Democratic Party even in 1964, why did a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The idea that Goldwater’s vote on the 1964 Civil Rights Act trumps a century of history of the Republican Party is ridiculous, to say the least.

Every political party has its racists, but the notion that Republicans are more racist than Democrats or any other party is based on nothing more than a constant drumbeat of unsubstantiated innuendo and assertions by Leftists, constantly echoed by the liberal media. It is a classic example of a Big Lie that becomes “true” simply by virtue of being repeated so many times.

A more likely explanation for the long-term shift from Democratic to Republican dominance in the South was the perception, fair or not, that the Democratic Party had rejected traditional Christian religious values and embraced radical secularism. That includes its hardline support for abortion, its rejection of prayer in public schools, its promotion of the gay agenda, and many other issues.

In the 1960s the Democratic Party changed its strategy for dealing with African Americans. Thanks to earlier Republican initiatives on civil rights, blatant racial oppression was no longer a viable political option. Whereas before that time Southern Democrats had overtly and proudly segregated and terrorized blacks, the national Democratic Party decided instead to be more subtle and get them as dependent on government as possible. As LBJ so elegantly put it (in a famous moment of candor that was recorded for posterity), “I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” At the same time, the Democrats started a persistent campaign of lies and innuendo, falsely equating any opposition to their welfare state with racism.

From a purely cynical political perspective, the Democratic strategy of black dependence has been extremely effective. LBJ knew exactly what he was doing. African Americans routinely vote well over 90 percent Democratic for fear that Republicans will cut their government benefits and welfare programs. And what is the result? Before LBJ’s Great Society welfare programs, the black illegitimacy rate was as low as 23 percent, but now it has more than tripled to 72 percent.

Most major American city governments have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, and most of those cities have large black sections that are essentially dysfunctional anarchies. Cities like Detroit are overrun by gangs and drug dealers, with burned out homes on every block in some areas. The land values are so low due to crime, blight, and lack of economic opportunity that condemned homes are not even worth rebuilding. Who wants to build a home in an urban war zone? Yet they keep electing liberal Democrats — and blaming “racist” Republicans for their problems!

Washington DC is another city that has been dominated by liberal Democrats for decades. It spends more per capita on students than almost any other city in the world, yet it has some of the worst academic achievement anywhere and is a drug-infested hellhole. Barack Obama would not dream of sending his own precious daughters to the DC public schools, of course — but he assures us that those schools are good enough for everyone else. In fact, Obama was instrumental in killing a popular and effective school voucher program in DC, effectively killing hopes for many poor black families trapped in those dysfunctional public schools. His allegiance to the teachers unions apparently trumps his concern for poor black families.

A strong argument could also be made that Democratic support for perpetual affirmative action is racist. It is, after all, the antithesis of Martin Luther King’s dream of a color-blind society. Not only is it “reverse racism,” but it is based on the premise that African Americans are incapable of competing in the free market on a level playing field. In other words, it is based on the notion of white supremacy, albeit “benevolent” white supremacy rather than the openly hostile white supremacy of the pre-1960s Democratic Party.

The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don’t fall for it.

Recommended Reading
Back to Basics for the Republican Party by Michael Zak
Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past by Bruce Bartlett
2011
RussP.us